GUILTY or NOT?

GUILTY or NOT? / Case library / Robbery, Theft & Property Crime

The Delusional Tenant

People v. Wetmore (1978)

Charge: Second-degree burglary Jurisdiction: California Heard on GUILTY or NOT?: 23 October 2026

Whether a man who moved into another's apartment believing it was his own home entered with the intent to steal that burglary requires.

The facts

The Defendant suffered from a serious psychotic illness. He entered another man's apartment while the resident was away — but he was not there to steal in any ordinary sense. Gripped by a delusion, the Defendant genuinely believed the apartment was his own home. He put on the resident's clothes, cooked and ate the resident's food, and rearranged the furniture to his liking, settling in as though he owned the place. When police arrived they found him living there, and he was charged with burglary — a crime that requires entering with the intent to commit theft or another felony inside. At trial the judge refused to let the Defendant introduce psychiatric evidence of his delusion, because that same evidence also tended to show he was legally insane.

You have the facts the court had. Did the prosecution prove it? Render your verdict in the game, then see what the court actually decided — and why.

Terms in this case

Citation: People v. Wetmore, 22 Cal. 3d 318, 583 P.2d 1308 (1978)

Read the full decision at law.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.