GUILTY or NOT?

GUILTY or NOT? / Case library / Robbery, Theft & Property Crime

Trial by Mathematics

People v. Collins (1968)

Charge: Second-degree robbery Jurisdiction: California Heard on GUILTY or NOT?: 18 October 2026

Whether odds of one in twelve million, built by multiplying the prosecution's own estimates for each trait, can prove this couple did the robbery.

The facts

On a June morning in 1964, an elderly woman was shoved to the ground in a Los Angeles alley and her purse was snatched. No witness could positively identify the culprits, but the descriptions were vivid: a young woman with a blond ponytail who fled in a yellow car driven by a bearded, mustached Black man. The Defendant and his wife — an interracial couple who owned a yellow Lincoln — were arrested. Short on solid eyewitness identification, the Prosecution called a mathematics instructor to the stand. He assigned a probability to each observed trait — the yellow car, the ponytail, the beard, the interracial couple — multiplied them together, and told the jury the odds that any OTHER couple fit the description were one in twelve million. The Defense argued the courtroom had been turned into a probability lecture built on numbers pulled from thin air.

You have the facts the court had. Did the prosecution prove it? Render your verdict in the game, then see what the court actually decided — and why.

Citation: People v. Collins, 68 Cal. 2d 319, 438 P.2d 33, 66 Cal. Rptr. 497 (1968)

Read the full decision at law.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.