GUILTY or NOT?

GUILTY or NOT? / Case library / Robbery, Theft & Property Crime

Can Computer Time Be Stolen?

Lund v. Commonwealth (1977)

Charge: Grand larceny Jurisdiction: Virginia Heard on GUILTY or NOT?: 3 November 2026

Whether computer time and services taken without authorization are goods that can be taken and carried away, as the law of larceny requires.

The facts

The Defendant was a graduate student at a state university working toward a Ph.D. When his faculty advisor's authorization for computer use lapsed, the Defendant continued running his dissertation computations using university computer time and keypunch-card services without authorization, obtaining printouts and cards along the way. He gained access using unauthorized account numbers and keys. The unauthorized computer time and services were valued at roughly $26,384. He was indicted for grand larceny. The Prosecution treated the misappropriated computer time and services — and the physical cards and printouts — as property that had been stolen. The Defense argued that Virginia's larceny statute reached only 'goods and chattels,' and that computer time and labor or services are not the kind of tangible personal property that can be taken and carried away.

You have the facts the court had. Did the prosecution prove it? Render your verdict in the game, then see what the court actually decided — and why.

Citation: Lund v. Commonwealth, 217 Va. 688, 232 S.E.2d 745 (1977)

Read the full decision at law.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.