The Silenced Warning
State v. Tally (1894)
Charge: Murder (aiding and abetting) Jurisdiction: Alabama Heard on GUILTY or NOT?: 6 October 2026
Whether a man who had a warning telegram suppressed aids a murder when it cannot be shown the victim would have escaped had the warning arrived.
The facts
A bitter family feud culminated when several armed brothers set out on horseback to overtake and kill a man who had wronged their family. A relative of the intended victim sent a telegram to warn him that armed men were in pursuit. The Defendant, a county judge allied with the pursuers, learned of the warning. He went to the telegraph office and wired the operator at the victim's destination not to deliver it: "Do not let the party warned get away. Say nothing." The operator suppressed the warning; the victim, never alerted, was overtaken and shot dead. The Defendant fired no shot and was miles away. The Prosecution charged him as an aider and abettor, arguing his interference deprived the victim of a chance to escape. The Defense argued the victim might well have been killed even with the warning, so the Defendant's act made no proven difference.
You have the facts the court had. Did the prosecution prove it? Render your verdict in the game, then see what the court actually decided — and why.
Get the daily case by email
One real criminal case in your inbox every morning. Free; unsubscribe any time.
Citation: 102 Ala. 25, 15 So. 722 (Ala. 1894)
Read the full decision at law.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.