GUILTY or NOT?

GUILTY or NOT? / Case library / Homicide

The Kerosene Cure

Commonwealth v. Pierce (1884)

Charge: Manslaughter Jurisdiction: Massachusetts Heard on GUILTY or NOT?: 17 October 2026

Whether a healer who wrapped a sick woman in kerosene-soaked cloths for days answers for her death though he meant to cure her and she agreed.

The facts

The Defendant, who held himself out as a physician, was called to treat a gravely ill woman confined to bed. He directed that flannel cloths be soaked in kerosene and kept against her body, replaced with freshly saturated flannels every few hours. The patient suffered intense pain, and when she had the cloths removed, the Defendant persuaded her to resume, assuring her it would help. The kerosene blistered and burned away the skin over most of her body, and she died several days later. Charged with manslaughter, the Defendant argued that he had acted in good faith to cure her, that she consented, and that he did not know kerosene would prove so dangerous.

You have the facts the court had. Did the prosecution prove it? Render your verdict in the game, then see what the court actually decided — and why.

Citation: Commonwealth v. Pierce, 138 Mass. 165 (1884)

Read the full decision at law.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.