The Man at the Window
State v. Hayes (1891)
Charge: Burglary and larceny Jurisdiction: Missouri Heard on GUILTY or NOT?: 5 October 2026
Whether a man who planned the break-in and boosted another through the window commits burglary when that other entered with no criminal intent.
The facts
The Defendant proposed to an acquaintance that the two break into a general store and steal bacon. Unknown to the Defendant, the acquaintance had no intention of committing a crime: he was connected to the store's owner, told the family of the plan, and went along only to catch the Defendant in the act. That night the Defendant boosted the acquaintance through a window. The acquaintance entered the building, handed a side of bacon out to the Defendant, who received it and began carrying it away before both were seized. The Defendant himself never entered the building. The Prosecution charged him with burglary on the theory that the acquaintance's entry could be attributed to him as a joint venturer. The Defense argued that because the acquaintance entered with no criminal intent, there was no burglarious entry the law could impute to the Defendant.
You have the facts the court had. Did the prosecution prove it? Render your verdict in the game, then see what the court actually decided — and why.
Get the daily case by email
One real criminal case in your inbox every morning. Free; unsubscribe any time.
Citation: 105 Mo. 76, 16 S.W. 514 (Mo. 1891)
Read the full decision at law.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.