The Orphan's Insult
Freddo v. State (1913)
Charge: Second-degree murder Jurisdiction: Tennessee Heard on GUILTY or NOT?: 7 October 2026
Whether repeated insults that cut at a man's deepest sensibilities can reduce a killing from murder to manslaughter when only words provoked it.
The facts
The Defendant, a young railroad worker, had endured repeated crude insults from a fellow worker, who habitually called him a "son of a bitch." The epithet stung the Defendant especially because he had been raised an orphan and revered his mother's memory, and he had warned the deceased to stop. On the day of the killing, after being called the name once more, the Defendant seized a steel bar and struck the co-worker a fatal blow. The Defendant claimed the deceased had also made a threatening motion toward him, raising self-defense, and argued that at worst the insulting words provoked a heat of passion reducing the offense to manslaughter. The Prosecution contended that mere words, however offensive, cannot reduce a killing from murder, and that the Defendant struck out of anger rather than fear.
You have the facts the court had. Did the prosecution prove it? Render your verdict in the game, then see what the court actually decided — and why.
Get the daily case by email
One real criminal case in your inbox every morning. Free; unsubscribe any time.
Terms in this case
Citation: 127 Tenn. 376, 155 S.W. 170 (Tenn. 1913)
Read the full decision at lawofselfdefense.com. The source reveals the outcome.