Someone Else's Numbers
Flores-Figueroa v. United States (2009)
Charge: Aggravated identity theft (18 U.S.C. § 1028A) Jurisdiction: Iowa · U.S. Supreme Court Heard on GUILTY or NOT?: 14 October 2026
Whether using a forged identity card is identity theft when the accused did not know the numbers on it belonged to a real living person.
The facts
The Defendant, a Mexican citizen working in the United States, gave his employer counterfeit Social Security and alien-registration cards bearing invented numbers. Years later he replaced them with new fakes — but these happened to carry numbers that actually belonged to real people, a fact he did not know. He was charged with aggravated identity theft, a crime that adds a mandatory two years for anyone who knowingly uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person. The Defendant argued the government had to prove he knew the numbers belonged to a real person; the government argued the word knowingly did not reach that far.
You have the facts the court had. Did the prosecution prove it? Render your verdict in the game, then see what the court actually decided — and why.
Get the daily case by email
One real criminal case in your inbox every morning. Free; unsubscribe any time.
Citation: Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009)
Read the full decision at supreme.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.