HomeCase Library › Lambert v. California

Lambert v. California

The Registration Ordinance

Citation
355 U.S. 225, 78 S.Ct. 240, 2 L.Ed.2d 228 (1957)
Year
1957
Charge
Failure to Register as a Convicted Felon — Los Angeles Municipal Ordinance
Source
Read the full decision

The facts

The Defendant had previously been convicted of forgery in Los Angeles — a California felony. She continued living in Los Angeles after her conviction. A Los Angeles Municipal Code ordinance (§ 52.39) required any person convicted of a crime punishable as a California felony to register with the Chief of Police within five days of arriving in or remaining in the city. Failure to register was a criminal offence punishable by a fine of up to $500 and up to six months in jail for every day of non-compliance after the five-day period. The Defendant had lived in Los Angeles for over seven years since her forgery conviction without registering. She was arrested on suspicion of committing another offence. At that time, Police discovered she had never registered. She was charged with violating the registration ordinance. At trial, the Defendant offered to prove she had no actual knowledge of the registration requirement. The trial Court refused to admit this evidence. The jury convicted her; she was fined $250 and placed on three years' probation.

The court's decision, its reasoning, and how other players voted are revealed when you play the case.

Play today's case

About this library

Every case in GUILTY or NOT? is a genuine published decision. This library carries the facts and the citation for cases that have already appeared in the game, so you can look them up, cite them, or read the judgment in full. The verdict stays in the game. Browse all cases.