Home › Case Library › Groh v. Ramirez
Groh v. Ramirez
The Blank Warrant
The facts
An ATF agent applied for a warrant to search a Montana ranch, submitting a detailed affidavit describing automatic weapons, grenades, rocket launchers, and related purchase records he believed were hidden there. A magistrate reviewed that application and signed a warrant. But the warrant the agent actually filled out did not list any of those items in the space calling for a description of the property to be seized; instead it described the residence itself, a two-story house, and never incorporated the application by reference. The next day the agent led federal and local officers to the ranch. The homeowner was away; his wife and children were present. No illegal weapons or explosives turned up, and nothing was seized. The agent left the wife a copy of the warrant but not the application, so the paper she held named no items at all; only after the family's attorney asked did he fax over the missing page. Left open: whether a search can stand when the warrant itself never describes what may be seized, so long as an application that did was reviewed by a judge beforehand.
The court's decision, its reasoning, and how other players voted are revealed when you play the case.
About this library
Every case in GUILTY or NOT? is a genuine published decision. This library carries the facts and the citation for cases that have already appeared in the game, so you can look them up, cite them, or read the judgment in full. The verdict stays in the game. Browse all cases.