GUILTY or NOT?

GUILTY or NOT? / Case library

The Hand-Drawn Map

State v. Gladstone (1970)

Charge: Aiding and Abetting the Sale of Marijuana Heard on GUILTY or NOT?: 21 September 2026

Whether telling a buyer where to find a seller, with no agreement and no stake in the sale, makes a man a party to it.

The facts

A police informant named Thompson set out to buy marijuana and approached the Defendant, a college student, to make a purchase. The Defendant did not have marijuana to sell and did not arrange a sale of his own. Instead, he told Thompson that another man — known as Kent — had some, gave Thompson Kent’s name, told him roughly where Kent lived, and drew a small map showing how to get to Kent’s residence. Thompson drove to Kent’s home on his own, and Kent sold him a quantity of marijuana. There was no evidence that the Defendant had any prior arrangement with Kent, communicated with Kent about the sale, shared in the proceeds, or had any stake whatever in whether the sale happened. On this record the State charged the Defendant with aiding and abetting Kent’s sale of marijuana, and he was convicted. The question was whether merely directing a willing buyer to a seller — without any connection to or interest in the seller’s transaction — is enough to make a person criminally responsible as an accomplice to that sale.

You have the facts the court had. Did the prosecution prove it? Render your verdict in the game, then see what the court actually decided — and why.

Citation: 78 Wn.2d 306, 474 P.2d 274 (Wash. 1970)

Read the full decision at law.justia.com. The source reveals the outcome.

← All cases