HomeCase Library › United States v. Storm

Awaiting decision

United States v. Storm

Will Judge Failla let the Tornado Cash conviction stand?

Court
U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y.
Division
Trial Court

Where the case stands

Rule 29 acquittal motion still undecided after April 2026 oral argument; Judge Failla has pushed the retrial on the two hung counts from Oct 2026 to April 26, 2027 to accommodate the pending motion

Background

Co-founder and developer of the Tornado Cash crypto-mixing protocol. The flagship U.S. prosecution testing whether writing and deploying open-source privacy code can be a crime — followed intensely by the crypto industry and civil-liberties groups.

Charges

The arguments

Prosecution/State: Storm "not only facilitated but also profited from money laundering"; Tornado Cash allegedly processed over $1B in illicit funds, including hundreds of millions for North Korea's Lazarus Group.

Defense: Tornado Cash is a lawful, non-custodial "neutral tool"; failing to prevent misuse is not agreeing to assist it; publishing code is protected by the First Amendment; the Supreme Court's Cox Communications ruling supports the neutral-tool defense.

The record

The line-setting read at the time this market opened

Reported courtroom read: Failla said the conviction's stability is "very much in play." DeFi Education Fund counsel criticized the government's technical presentation and expects the case to continue to a late-2026 retrial either way.

Awaiting decision — Judge Failla ruling on the acquittal/new-trial motions; final pretrial conference April 20, 2027; retrial of hung counts April 26, 2027 The ruling is posted here, and on the board, the moment it's confirmed by two or more independent news organizations.

Take the bench →

Sources

About this library

Every case on Bet! GUILTY or NOT? is a real, currently pending or recently decided court matter. This library carries the casebrief and the sources for every case on the docket — open or decided. Browse the full docket library.